Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $35.14 vs $341.19
- Up to 88% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.18 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G3930T - 230 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
192
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6843 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
12%
Price, €
€341.19
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €341.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6844 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |