Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930T - 289 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $31.66 vs $604.62
- Up to 94% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.14 vs $2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €671.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
255
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 35 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |