Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1402 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 26% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G3930T - 285 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $31.66 vs $267.83
- Up to 85% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.16 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €297.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
226
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |