Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 2300X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 39 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 2300X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 2300X - 427 vs 405 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2300X - €12.76 vs €89.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 2300X - €0.03 vs €0.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 2300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
427
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4521 minutes ago
Buy for €89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4522 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2300X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |