Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 559 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-10300 - 60 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - €12.76 vs €108.34
- Up to 89% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-10300 - €0.21 vs €1.9 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2086 minutes ago
Buy for €108.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |