Buy on Amazon
€89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300X is 1105 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2300X - €68.52 vs €89.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 3 2300X - €0.27 vs €0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 2300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X 3.5GHz Tray
Buy for €89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12236 minutes ago
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I3-6100 I3 6100 3,7 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 51 W CPU Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen 3 2300X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
