Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300X is 2148 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8300 - 129 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2300X - €73.57 vs €89.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 3 2300X - €0.62 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 8 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12471 minutes ago
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12470 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |