Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 556 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 1600 - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - €12.76 vs €99.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 1600 - €0.08 vs €0.66 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17159 minutes ago
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |