Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2187 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 34% better in Rust than FX-8300 - 207 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than FX-8300 - €12.76 vs €73.57
- Up to 88% better value when playing Rust than FX-8300 - €0.06 vs €0.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17825 minutes ago
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |