Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 397 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Athlon 3000G - 125 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - €69.0 vs €585.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-9900K - €0.58 vs €4.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €585 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |