Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 817 vs 750 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €183.04 vs €307.15
- Up to 37% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-10900KF - €0.24 vs €0.38 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
817
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
63%
Price, €
€307.15
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €307.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
750
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€183.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €183.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |