Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Ryzen 5 2600X - 179 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €133.12 vs €318.6
- Up to 57% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-10900KF - €0.77 vs €1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.78/FPS
43%
Price, €
€318.6
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €318.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17976 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
172
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €133.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |