Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 218 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1620 - 140 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - €20.16 vs €110.68
- Up to 81% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i7-3770 - €0.15 vs €0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €110.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
139
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |