Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2479 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 12% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i5-4690K - 192 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €89.07 vs €148.12
- Up to 32% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i5-11600 - €0.52 vs €0.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
67%
Price, €
€148.12
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15318 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
172
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 88 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |