Buy on Amazon
€148.12
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $194
Availability
MSRP in USD: $194
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 28% better in Minecraft than Core i5-3570 - 794 vs 622 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €87.75 vs €148.12
- Up to 26% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-11600 - €0.14 vs €0.19 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
794
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
73%
Price, €
€148.12
59%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-11600 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 2.8GHz Tuboboost: 4.8GHz, 6 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811600
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16101 minutes ago
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
622
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3570 Prozessor (3,4GHz, Sockel 1155, 6MB Cache, 77 Watt)
Buy for €87.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
