Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 32% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-10400F - 215 vs 163 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €91.6 vs €148.12
- Up to 19% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i5-11600 - €0.56 vs €0.69 per FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
81%
Price, €
€148.12
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13806 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
163
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13807 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |