Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i3-10300 - 285 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €108.34 vs €148.12
- Up to 25% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-11600 - €0.39 vs €0.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
75%
Price, €
€148.12
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15802 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €108.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |