Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 and the more expensive Core i5-10400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10400 - 134 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €96.68 vs €108.52
- Up to 12% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10400 - €0.72 vs €0.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €96.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for €108.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |