Buy on Amazon
€108.34
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $194
Availability
MSRP in USD: $194
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3570 - 134 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - €87.75 vs €108.34
- Up to 9% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10300 - €0.74 vs €0.81 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
91%
Price, €
€108.34
80%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10300 (Basistakt: 3,70GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110300
Buy for €108.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19571 minutes ago
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
118
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3570 Prozessor (3,4GHz, Sockel 1155, 6MB Cache, 77 Watt)
Buy for €87.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19571 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
