Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 3200G - 207 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - €63.08 vs €202.96
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €202.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75801 minutes ago
Buy for €63.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75803 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
67.22044728434506%
Multi-Core
3013
62.83628779979145%
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |