Buy on Amazon
€120.06
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 and the cheaper Pentium Gold G6400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium Gold G6400 - 107 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €83.86 vs €120.06
- Up to 22% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-10400 - €0.87 vs €1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
77%
Price, €
€120.06
69%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10400 Desktop-Prozessor, 6 Kerne, bis zu 4,3 GHz, LGA1200 (Chipsatz der Intel® 400er-Reihe), 65 W
Buy for €120.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19350 minutes ago
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
96
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€83.86
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 Processor 4 GHz 4 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €83.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19349 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
