Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Athlon 3000G - 159 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €69.0 vs €120.06
- Up to 41% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10400 - €0.45 vs €0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
59%
Price, €
€120.06
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €120.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15618 minutes ago
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15618 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |