Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-8300 - 257 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €73.57 vs €120.06
- Up to 38% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-10400 - €0.29 vs €0.47 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
61%
Price, €
€120.06
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €120.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15264 minutes ago
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |