Buy on Amazon
€120.06
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 188 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €60.24 vs €120.06
- Up to 45% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10400 - €0.35 vs €0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
54%
Price, €
€120.06
50%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10400 Desktop-Prozessor, 6 Kerne, bis zu 4,3 GHz, LGA1200 (Chipsatz der Intel® 400er-Reihe), 65 W
Buy for €120.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15161 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
