Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1430 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6800K - 160 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - €96.68 vs €126.25
- Up to 25% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6800K - €0.6 vs €0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €96.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
Buy for €126.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |