Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €93.8 vs €205.04
- Up to 50% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-11600K - €0.53 vs €1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10300 - 194 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €93.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
50%
Price, €
€205.04
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €205.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |