Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 659 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600K - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €188.97 vs €210.77
- Up to 11% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600K - €1.15 vs €1.29 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10876 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10876 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |