Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2744 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-6700 - 243 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €153.72 vs €186.93
- Up to 1% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-13400F - €0.76 vs €0.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
98%
Price, €
€186.93
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
202
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€153.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €153.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |