Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-12400 - 659 vs 658 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €169.95 vs €210.77
- Up to 19% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-11600K - €0.26 vs €0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
659
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
81%
Price, €
€210.77
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7858 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
658
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€169.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €169.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7858 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |