Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €154.89 vs €169.95
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-12400 - €0.71 vs €0.78 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €169.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5512 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5512 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |