Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €174.0 vs €255.98
- Up to 30% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-11900F - €0.63 vs €0.9 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i3-10300 - 286 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€174
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €174 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
70%
Price, €
€255.98
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for €255.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |