Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 33% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8300 - 206 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €73.57 vs €148.12
- Up to 35% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11600 - €0.47 vs €0.72 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
65%
Price, €
€148.12
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16387 minutes ago
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |