Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2400S - 203 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €69.9 vs €148.12
- Up to 42% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600 - €0.42 vs €0.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
57%
Price, €
€148.12
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
168
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |