Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-4440 - 179 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €59.04 vs €148.12
- Up to 57% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-11600 - €0.36 vs €0.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
43%
Price, €
€148.12
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
162
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |