Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 10% better in Fortnite than Celeron G3900 - 236 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €59.9 vs €138.86
- Up to 53% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-11600 - €0.28 vs €0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
47%
Price, €
€138.86
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €138.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10914 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
214
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |