Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4170 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4170 is 488 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i3-4170 - €47.66 vs €138.85
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4170 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - 171 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €47.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Buy for €138.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
52.770208900999094%
Multi-Core
992
46.57276995305165%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |