Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 664 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - €51.08 vs €522.8
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3900 - 132 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €51.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75682 minutes ago
Buy for €522.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75683 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
40.85794655414909%
Multi-Core
992
11.297118779182327%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |