Buy on Amazon
€47.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1546 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - €47.66 vs €699.9
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than Celeron G3900 - 63 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €47.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 9 3950x Retail (AM4/16 Core/4,70 GHz/70 MB/105 W) 100-100000051WOF Silber
Buy for €699.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
