Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1791 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €47.66 vs €539.9
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G3900 - 230 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €47.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
Buy for €539.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
33.39080459770115%
Multi-Core
992
10.90589270008795%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |