Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10850K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 891 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €339.95 vs €568.47
- Up to 33% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-13900F - €2.48 vs €3.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10850K - 153 vs 137 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
137
89%
Value, €/FPS
€2.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€339.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €339.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.72/FPS
66%
Price, €
€568.47
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €568.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |