Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-9900KF - 132 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €430.01 vs €569.53
- Up to 11% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - €3.84 vs €4.31 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.31/FPS
89%
Price, €
€569.53
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €569.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
112
84%
Value, €/FPS
€3.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€430.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |