Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 152 vs 128 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €82.0 vs €407.64
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €407.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
128
84.21052631578947%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€82
100%
Buy for €82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
43.00366300366301%
Multi-Core
6976
40.51338637551542%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |