Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Fortnite than Core i7-3770 - 244 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €117.19 vs €577.41
- Up to 77% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-13900F - €0.54 vs €2.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
244
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.37/FPS
22%
Price, €
€577.41
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €577.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 321 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
216
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €117.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 321 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |