Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Valorant than Ryzen 5 3400G - 949 vs 746 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €87.77 vs €577.41
- Up to 80% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-13900F - €0.12 vs €0.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
949
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
19%
Price, €
€577.41
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €577.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
746
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €87.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |