Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 696 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €85.63 vs €102.0
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 21% better in League of Legends than Ryzen 5 3400G - 154 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen 5 3400G - €0.66 vs €0.67 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 24 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €85.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24977 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102
83%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |