Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1787 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 51% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 2400G - 80 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €74.94 vs €417.11
- Up to 73% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-13900F - €1.41 vs €5.21 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €417.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2397 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
53
66%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |