Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i3-3220 - 225 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €62.12 vs €396.72
- Up to 81% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i9-13900F - €0.33 vs €1.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
18.75%
Price, €
€396.72
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €396.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3748 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
188
83.55555555555556%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €62.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3748 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
19.230769230769234%
Multi-Core
1085
6.301178930251466%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |