Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 895 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 14% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3900 - 165 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - €51.75 vs €124.22
- Up to 52% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 2400G - €0.36 vs €0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
48%
Price, €
€124.22
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €124.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |