Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 985 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 3100 - 480 vs 418 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €96.97 vs €569.48
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900F - €0.23 vs €1.19 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
480
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
19%
Price, €
€569.48
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €569.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
418
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €96.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |