Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 620 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 15% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €56.71 vs €66.9
- Up to 14% better value when playing Stray than Celeron G6900 - €0.31 vs €0.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Ryzen 3 3100 - 185 vs 184 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
184
99.45945945945947%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58288 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
86.11111111111111%
Price, €
€66.9
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €66.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |